concretely at the highest-levels this looks like:
multi-chain (not “one chain to rule them all), multi-AI (not one AGI), multi-reserve-stores (not one reserve currency), multi-polar (not one leading nation)
You’re absolutely right, at a concrete level the progression towards continuity and interconnectedness manifests in:
Multi-chain frameworks (rather than a single dominant blockchain) allow different models to interact.
A diversity of AI systems (not one AGI) enables specialty algorithms to connect.
Holding reserves in multiple assets rather than a single currency distributes value across a network.
A multi-polar world of influential nations prevents centralized power.
In all these cases, the embrace of multiplicity and diversity reflects a more continuous, less discretized view - no one solution or entity can capture the complexity of the territory. Interoperability and hybridization are key.
The proliferation of options and connections in these domains mirrors the proliferation of language and math needed to map reality more accurately. No single chain, AI, currency, or nation alone can model the continuous territory - only the collective interaction of multiple systems can start to approximate continuity.
So in essence, the concrete paradigm shifts here all point to transcending discretization and separateness through embracing diverse, hybrid systems and their synergistic networks. The map becomes more continuous by proliferating interconnected models, rather than declaring one supreme model. This in turn allows decisions and governance to be computed more continuously.