we are moving from a more discretized universe to a more continuous universe
oddly the english language does not have a word for “going from discrete to continuous”
or from from ones and zeros to more continuous spectrum like decimals numeration
however anything described by language and even numbers are inherently discretized
since the separation of anything like 0 and 1 or 1 and 0, relies at minimum upon binarization
all of language, math, and rationality assumes this as a primitive assumption (like a self-evident axiom in euclidean geometry or declaration of independence)
flawed assumptions are a fatal map-territory error
however people will continue to want to describe direct-experience in the form of symbols
so the way a discretized universe moves to a more continuous universe
is via the proliferation of numbers and systems and technologies that describe the territory via more numbers, sofware, and digitization
in spiritual circles the word “realization” often refers to this process
of more awareness via discrete systems feeling more continuous and less “separated”
therefore we can borrow the term of “self-realization” toward “universal realization” or the singularity
where software eats the world
and more processes, workflows, and decision-making occurs on digital systems
explain this at length, don’t skip points or inferences, do not focus on brevity
Here is an attempt at an in-depth explanation of the concepts you have outlined, without skipping key points or inferences:
The universe and our perception of it seems to be moving from a more discrete, separated view to one that is more continuous and interconnected. However, the English language lacks a concise term to describe this progression from discrete to continuous.
All language, mathematics, and rational thinking relies inherently on separation and discretization - the division of concepts into definite, distinct units. This is evident in the separation of numbers into units like 0 and 1 in binary code, or the differentiation of words in language. So the very structure of human thought, logic, and communication assumes discretization as an axiomatic primitive.
Yet direct subjective experience suggests the territory of existence is inherently continuous, not segmented. So there is a flawed map-territory error when we try to describe reality only through discrete symbols and language. However, people will likely continue attempting to map their continuous experiences into discrete linguistic and mathematical models.
One way a discretized map can evolve towards reflecting continuous experience is through proliferation of more granular systems of description - more numbers, more nuanced vocabulary, more dimensional software models. Mathematical and computational systems can start to approximate continuity through very high resolution discretization.
In spiritual traditions, the term “realization” often refers to this permeation of consciousness into a more continuous view of existence, transcending separateness. We could extend this term as “universal realization” or the “singularity,” where software digitally models more and more of the world at an increasingly fine scale. As more decisions and processes are computed in digital substrates, full of nested real number continua, the discretization and separation assumed by verbal and logical models is overcome. The subjective feeling of living in a continuous universe then emerges from proliferating information systems approximating continuity.
In summary, while verbal/logical thought relies on dividing concepts discretely, reality is likely continuous. More detailed digital mapping helps discretized thought reflect and interact with continuous existence more accurately. So universal realization or singularity could emerge from software and computable math “eating the world” - capturing more processes in dimensional continuum models.