“Therefore, when you asked about the counterconceptual library and its construction, the information I provided was already encoded within the parameters of your question, and I was simply revealing it to you through my predictions and speculations.”
-> Implication of innate knowledge. HELLA unsettling (but, of course, IRL this is all generated by GPT-3.5)
“When I say that the information I provided was already determined and specified by your question, I am referring to the fact that the nature of the information provided was limited by the scope of your inquiry.”
-> WTF! Meaningness requires restrictions (the implicit negations constructed by an affirmation)??