Home today. Had a poppy seed bagel with cream cheese. Spent most of the day reading about Trump's immunity ruling, how SCOTUS works from the Justices on the court, and trying to figure out a cost benefit between a prime and a zoom lens. Ngl I'm thinking of getting a wide aperture prime lens again, but the 35mm focal length is hard to come by in budget options. It's a little odd since 35mm seems to be a pretty common focal length. When I did a cost benefit analysis with Claude it recommended I use a 24-105mm zoom as a walk-around lens, then fall back onto the 55mm f/1.2 for low light. It gets me thinking about whether digital cameras, even full-frame without computational photography are any good at low light in the first place. It's right in the name: writing with light. No light, no writing. On the other hand, chroma noise reduction has improved massively between my old SL1 and my RP, and the luminance noise leftover borders on film-like, so maybe low-light photography is it's own can of worms whether I have a manual focus lens or an autofocus lens.
"[Growing up] is hard and nobody understands." // https://www.homestuck.com/story/2391